Human Complacency

    When it comes to aviation maintenace i feel the biggest human factors are complacency or invulnerabilty.  Whether it is task, organizational, or stress/fatigue induced complacency it all lead to maintaners not being 100% there when doing a job.  In maintenance you can see some people are just going about the job and lacking all situational awareness and seem to forget that they are actually in a dangerous proffesion.  They get this very relaxed, carefree attitude towards the work they are doing which can become impressionable to newer workers. 



    When it comes to team activities and have complacency amount the team, it causes inadequate work and none trustworthy work.  It can also lead to dangerous situations that can cause damage to aircraft or injury to personnel.  The team activity that comes to mine is engine removals from aircraft.  Sometimes they can seem very teddious and workers could get complacent.  It is when that happens, you tend to forget steps and accidents happen or quality of work begins to decline. 

Reference

Complacency in Aviation - AviationKnowledge. (2011, August). Aviation Knowledge. http://aviationknowledge.wikidot.com/aviation:complacency

Comments

  1. UnknownDecember 16, 2021 at 6:42 AM

    "Complacency kills" is something that I am sure you have heard before. It is no joke either. Many laws and regulations in the aviation community are written in blood and scar tissue meaning that someone had to learn the hard way. Complacency is one of those things that leads to the hard way of finding out. A lot of times it is the most experienced pilots that end up in accidents because they have gotten complacent and lax in their routines and responsibilities. I can think of a great video involving the phrase, "oh ye of little faith." (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAwq0R8PLHc) Watch it if you haven't seen it before. The more experienced pilot decided to risk a maneuver and try to fit through a gap in the trees leading to rotor blade contact. Had he taken time to make a better decision and not been complacent there would never have been an accident at all.

    Josh L

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Development of Crew Resource Management

Image
For my blog I am going to talk about the introduction of Crew Resource Management (CRM) and what led to its development.   First, it must be noted that CRM did not emerge from a singular accident but was influenced by a series of accidents and incidents.   CRM was created in response to the realization that many aviation accidents were either caused or exacerbated by the human factor of communication.   During these critical times when an emergency happened there was a lack of communication between the pilots and flight engineers, poor decision making, and ultimately led to an inefficient team and flight deck.             As mentioned, multiple accidents led to the development of CRM but one notable one was the Tenerife Airport Disaster in 1977.   This disaster was caused by two Boeing 747 colliding on the runway and killing more than 580 people.   The weather this day was foggy and air traffic was very busy and all communications were through just the pilot.   The miscommunication b
Read more

Engine Importance

Image
Every part of an airplane is needed for an aircraft to take off, however I feel the most critical system in any aircraft is the powerplant.  No matter what without a powerplant all any aircraft would be is a very expensive paper weight.  Depending on the aircraft there may only be one engine and any type of total engine failure could result in aircraft incident and could potentially lead to death.  With modern day airliners most have two engines which losing both motors is very rare.  In a USA Today, they interviewed pilot John Cox, and when asked about total engine failure he responded " It would vary depending upon the wind, but around 100 miles would be a good estimate. Having all engines quit in a modern airplane is extremely rare"(John Cox, 2013). However, if you take a F-16 with a single motor and extremely different aerodynamics compared to an airliner, with total engine failure there is no gliding.  Total engine failure means you have seconds to point the aircraft and
Read more

F-15 to F-35 Engines

Image
  For this weeks blog post I did not have to look anywhere but instead listen.   What I mean by that is the F-15 and F-35’s taking off outside my house is what gave me inspiration to write about what I know and love, jet engines.   The F-15 carries around 2 F100-220/229 and has been doing so since the 1970’s and it is my job to tear down, inspect, rebuild, and test these engines making sure they can stay in a Jet as long as possible.   Pratt and Whitney also had this in mind as they constantly update and revise certain things inside the engine whether it’s a Turbine, Stator, or even an engine computer, they are constantly learning and tweaking the engine to make it more efficient and stronger.   They also used this motor to help develop other motors, to include the F-135 engine.               With the new F-135 engine, producing double the thrust of a 229 (roughly 43,000 lbf) it also derived in a way from a 229.   As Airforce technology explains “Components from F119 and F100-229 e
Read more